April 4, 2003
MS DRUG SHOWS PROMISE AGAINST ALS
A new study by Israeli scientists shows that the multiple sclerosis
drug Copaxone protects mice against amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS), with an effect on survival greater than
or equal to that of most other drugs tested in the mice. Though its
mechanism of action is unclear, and other labs have seen far less impressive
results, researchers are calling for a clinical trial of the drug in
people with ALS.
ALS is a paralyzing, often fatal disease, caused by the death of muscle-controlling
nerve cells called motor neurons. The disease process is poorly understood,
and the only FDA-approved treatment, Rilutek (riluzole), extends life
by just a few months.
MS is debilitating but doesn’t affect life span. It’s triggered
by autoimmunity, a self-directed attack of the immune system, against
myelin, a coating that insulates nerve cells and speeds the signals
that flow between them. Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) slows the destruction
of myelin and reduces the relapse rate in relapsing-remitting MS.
Although ALS and MS have little in common on the surface, some studies
suggest that the immune system might influence the course of ALS. Though
controversial, these studies motivated Michal Schwartz and her colleagues
at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, to test Copaxone
against ALS in mice.
Mice with a genetic form of the disease received a single injection
of Copaxone at 60 days of age, and thereafter they received it through
their drinking water. (For MS, Copaxone is taken by injection.)
The average life span of the treated mice was 263 days, while that
of untreated mice was 211 days — a difference of about 25 percent.
The treatment also significantly delayed the onset of motor symptoms.
The mice carry mutations in the SOD1 gene, linked to hereditary ALS
in humans in 1993. But since only about 10 percent of human ALS cases
are hereditary — and only 3 percent can be traced to mutations
in the SOD1 gene — Schwartz and her team also examined Copaxone’s
effect on a more general injury to motor neurons. When a nerve is severed,
the motor neurons passing through it tend to die back, but in mice given
Copaxone, a significant number of motor neurons survived surgical cutting
of the facial nerve.
Schwartz’s study, published online by the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences on March 31, has generated mixed reactions.
“I am delighted that this [study] is coming out,” said
neurologist Benjamin Brooks, who directs the MDA/ALS Clinical Research
Center at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. “We have a lot
of experience with Copaxone in our MS patients. We need to see if it
will synergize with riluzole or other agents in ALS.”
Serge Przedborski, a neurologist at Columbia University in New York
and a member of MDA’s Scientific Advisory Committee, is more cautious
about the study, but still enthusiastic about a possible trial of Copaxone
in people with ALS.
“I think the idea of modulating the immune system [in ALS] is
a wonderful strategy, but I’m confused by what they report,”
he said. Using a different protocol from the one Schwartz’s group
used, he’s also testing Copaxone in mice with SOD1-related ALS,
and has seen only modest improvements, if any.
“I’m not saying that I don’t trust their data, but
we know that in immunology, a small difference in protocol can make
a big difference in results.” He’s planning to retest Schwartz’s
regimen in the mice and compare it to his own.
Another problem, he said, is that Schwartz didn’t explore how
Copaxone protects against ALS in the mice. On the other hand, Copaxone
has become an accepted treatment for MS, and no one is really sure how
it works against that disease either. The drug, manufactured by the
Israel-based TEVA Pharmaceuticals, is actually a synthetic fragment
of a protein found in myelin.
Proneuron, based in Los Angeles, owns the rights to use Copaxone against
ALS, and Przedborski has contacted the company about conducting a clinical
trial, but hasn’t received a response.
Outside of such a trial, he said, “I would not encourage people
[with ALS] to take Copaxone. At the very least, a small safety study
should be done.”